Alp Horoz vs Oskari Eerola Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second serve performance: Horoz has a 43.49% success rate in winning points from their second serve in recent months. Eerola slightly edges out Horoz with a 43.9% success rate. Can this marginal difference influence the match's outcome?
• Return game stats: Eerola leads in return performance by winning 46.09% of opponents' second serve points compared to Horoz's 44.41%. For first serves, Eerola again comes out on top with 32.83%, whereas Horoz wins 28.96%.
• Under pressure: Horoz is impressive at saving breakpoints, achieving a 49.07% success rate recently. In contrast, Eerola struggles more under pressure, with only 31.43% of breakpoints saved.
• Performance overview: Over the past year, Horoz has emerged victorious in 57.81% of their matches, showing a more consistent performance than Eerola, who has won 50% of their games.
• Best surface: Horoz excels on Hard courts with a 56% win rate. Eerola's best surface is Clay, holding a 38% success rate on this surface.
• Player level: Horoz has participated in ITF tournaments more frequently, with a 58.73% win rate, slightly outperforming Eerola, who has a 53.33% success rate in these events.
• Opponent quality: Horoz competes against players averaging a rank of 198.53, while Eerola plays against higher-ranked opponents, with an average rank of 50.63.
• Deciding set performance: Eerola is strong in deciding sets, winning 60% of them, whereas Horoz has a 47% win rate in similar scenarios.
• Break point conversion: Recently, Horoz has converted 43.55% of break point opportunities, superior to Eerola's 33.33% conversion rate.

Editorial Prediction (August 12, 2025, UTC):

When assessing both players' performances, Eerola shows dominance in return games, an essential element in tennis matches. This strength could give Eerola an advantage, especially against Horoz's slightly weaker second serve.

Although Horoz demonstrates a stronger ability to defend breakpoints, which is critical during high-pressure situations, their lesser experience compared to Eerola in games against higher-ranked opponents might narrow their edge.

Horoz shows better overall consistency in match wins, but Eerola's stronger performance in deciding sets demonstrates resilience when it counts the most. This could prove decisive in a tightly contested match.

Taking into account the various statistics and gameplay elements, Eerola's performance against higher-quality opponents and ability in crucial moments makes them the more likely player to win the upcoming tennis match.